Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11469757›Full record

ReviewMycopathologia2001

In vitro antifungal activities of voriconazole and reference agents as determined by NCCLS methods: review of the literature.

A Espinel-Ingroff, K Boyle, D J Sheehan

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycopathologia, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Isavuconazole.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CNS Infections Caused by Brown-Black Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. A Review of Antimicrobial Therapy for Infectious Uveitis of the Posterior Segment.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Espinel-IngroffDivision of Infectious Diseases, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0049, USA. avingrof@hsc.vcu.edu
K Boyle
D J Sheehan
Pfizer (United States) · USVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voriconazole (VfendTM) is a new triazole that currently is undergoing phase III clinical trials. This review summarizes the published data obtained by NCCLS methods on the in vitro antifungal activity of voriconazole in comparison to itraconazole, amphotericin B, fluconazole, ketoconazole and flucytosine. Voriconazole had fungistatic activity against most yeasts and yeastlike species (minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs] < 2 microg/ml) that was similar or superior to those of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and itraconazole. Against Candida glabrata and C. krusei, voriconazole MIC ranges were 0.03 to 8 and 0.01 to > 4 microg/ml, respectively. For four of the six Aspergillus spp. evaluated, voriconazole MICs (< 0.03 to 2 microg/ml) were lower than amphotericin B (0.25 to 4 microg/ml) and similar to itraconazole MICs. Voriconazole fungistatic activity against Fusarium spp. has been variable. Against E oxysporum and F. solani, most studies showed MICs ranging from 0.25 to 8 microg/ml. Voriconazole had excellent fungistatic activity against five of the six species of dimorphic fungi evaluated (MIC90s < 1.0 microg/ml). The exception was Sporothrix schenckii (MIC90s and geometric mean MICs > or = 8 microg/ml). Only amphotericin B had good fungistatic activity against the Zygomycetes species (voriconazole MICs ranged from 2 to > 32 microg/ml). Voriconazole showed excellent in vitro activity (MICs < 0.03 to 1.0 microg/ml) against most of the 50 species of dematiaceous fungi tested, but the activity of all the agents was poor against most isolates of Scedosporium prolificans and Phaeoacremonium parasiticum (Phialophora parasitica). Voriconazole had fungicidal activity against most Aspergillus spp., B. dermatitidis, and some dematiaceous fungi. In vitro/in vivo correlations should aid in the interpretation of these results.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFluconazoleHumansItraconazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPyrimidinesReference StandardsTriazolesVoriconazoleAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleItraconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID11469757
OpenAlexW1565636659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.