Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11468941›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2001

In vivo-in vitro correlation (IVIVC) modeling incorporating a convolution step.

T O'Hara, S Hayes, J Davis, J Devane, T Smart, A Dunne

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A nonlinear mixed effects IVIVC model for multi-release drug delivery systems.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Analyzing multi-response data using forcing functions.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T O'HaraElan Corporation plc, Athlone, Ireland.
S Hayes
J Davis
J Devane
T Smart
A Dunne

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of in vivo-in vitro correlation (IVIVC) modeling is described. These models are usually fitted to deconvoluted data rather than the raw plasma drug concentration/time data. Such a two-stage analysis is undesirable because the deconvolution step is unstable and because the fitted model predicts the fraction of a dosage unit dissolved/absorbed in vivo which generally is not the primary focus of our attention. Interest usually centers on the plasma drug concentration or some function of it (e.g., AUC, Cmax). Incorporation of a convolution step into the model overcomes these difficulties. Odds, hazards, and reversed hazards models which include a convolution step are described. The identity model (which states that average in vivo and in vitro dissolution/time curves are coincident or directly superimposable) is a special case of these models. The odds model and the identity model were fitted to data sets for two different products using nonlinear mixed effects model fitting software. Results show that the odds model describes both data sets reasonably well and is a significantly better fit than the identity model in each case.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalCross-Over StudiesHumansNonlinear DynamicsSolubilityTabletsTablets

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.