Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11466188›Full record

GuidelineArchives of disease in childhood2001

An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management.

K Armon, T Stephenson, R MacFaul, P Eccleston, U Werneke

Abstract readGuidelinePractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Archives of disease in childhood, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Lactose avoidance for young children with acute diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Antimotility agents for chronic diarrhoea in people with HIV/AIDS.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Acute infectious diarrhea in children.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2009
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Acute dehydration in infant].Journal de pediatrie et de puericulture · 2008
    Article
  17. How has research changed my practice in the last 5 years?Archives of disease in childhood · 2007
    Article
  18. Article
  19. [Acute infectious diarrhea].Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 2007
    Review
  20. Best practice in primary care pathology: review 6.Journal of clinical pathology · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K ArmonAcademic Division of Child Health, School of Human Development, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. mk.armon@ntlworld.com
T Stephenson
R MacFaul
P Eccleston
U Werneke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop an evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of the child who presents to hospital with diarrhoea (with or without vomiting), a common problem representing 16% of all paediatric medical attenders at an accident and emergency department. Clinical assessment, investigations (biochemistry and stool culture in particular), admission, and treatment are addressed. The guideline aims to aid junior doctors in recognising children who need admission for observation and treatment and those who may safely go home. EVIDENCE: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Selected articles were appraised, graded, and synthesised qualitatively. Statements on recommendation were generated. CONSENSUS: An anonymous, postal Delphi consensus process was used. A panel of 39 selected medical and nursing staff were asked to grade their agreement with the generated statements. They were sent the papers, appraisals, and literature review. On the second and third rounds they were asked to re-grade their agreement in the light of other panelists' responses. Consensus was predefined as 83% of panelists agreeing with the statement. RECOMMENDATIONS: Clinical signs useful in assessment of level of dehydration were agreed. Admission to a paediatric facility is advised for children who show signs of dehydration. For those with mild to moderate dehydration, estimated deficit is replaced over four hours with oral rehydration solution (glucose based, 200-250 mOsm/l) given "little and often". A nasogastric tube should be used if fluid is refused and normal feeds started following rehydration. Children at high risk of dehydration should be observed to ensure at least maintenance fluid is tolerated. Management of more severe dehydration is detailed. Antidiarrhoeal medication is not indicated. VALIDATION: The guideline has been successfully implemented and evaluated in a paediatric accident and emergency department.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAntidiarrhealsChildChild, PreschoolDehydrationDelphi TechniqueDiagnosis, DifferentialDiarrheaEvidence-Based MedicineFluid TherapyGastroenteritisHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPatient AdmissionAntidiarrheals

Identifiers

PMID11466188
PMCPMC1718867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.