Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11465895›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2001

Identification of physiological systems: estimation of linear time-varying dynamics with non-white inputs and noisy outputs.

M Lortie, R E Kearney

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Summary of Human Ankle Mechanical Impedance During Walking.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2016
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Dynamic primitives in the control of locomotion.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  4. System identification of physiological systems using short data segments.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M LortieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
R E Kearney

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new technique to identify linear time-varying systems from ensembles of input-output realisations is presented. First, a correlation-based least-squares method is derived. This method consists of solving, for each sampling time, a matrix equation involving estimates of the input autocorrelation and input-output cross-correlation functions computed from data across the ensemble. Then, the matrix inverse needed to solve this matrix equation is replaced with a pseudo-inverse. The model is thus constrained to describe only those components of the dynamics that can be reliably identified. Ignoring 'unidentifiable' components has virtually no adverse effect on the predicted outputs. Simulation results demonstrate that the pseudoinverse technique yields more reliable estimates of the dynamics than a previously proposed least-squares technique when the inputs are coloured and the output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is low. With the input spectrum flat up to approximately 10% of the sampling rate and an output SNR of 5dB, the mean variance accounted for (VAF) between the true instantaneous impulse response functions (IRFs) and the instantaneous IRFs estimated with the least-squares technique was 0.2%. In contrast, the mean VAF between the true instantaneous IRFs and the instantaneous IRFs estimated with the pseudoinverse technique was 89.0%.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID11465895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.