Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11463624›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2001

The optical stretcher: a novel laser tool to micromanipulate cells.

J Guck, R Ananthakrishnan, H Mahmood, T J Moon, C C Cunningham, J Käs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 252 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
252citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

252 citing papers in PubMed, 968 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measuring the Elastic Properties of Living Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

192 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J GuckCenter for Nonlinear Dynamics, Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712, USA. jguck@chaos.ph.utexas.edu
R Ananthakrishnan
H Mahmood
T J Moon
C C Cunningham
J Käs
The University of Texas at Austin · USBaylor University Medical Center · US

Funding

PHS HHS 26-1601-1683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a dielectric object is placed between two opposed, nonfocused laser beams, the total force acting on the object is zero but the surface forces are additive, thus leading to a stretching of the object along the axis of the beams. Using this principle, we have constructed a device, called an optical stretcher, that can be used to measure the viscoelastic properties of dielectric materials, including biologic materials such as cells, with the sensitivity necessary to distinguish even between different individual cytoskeletal phenotypes. We have successfully used the optical stretcher to deform human erythrocytes and mouse fibroblasts. In the optical stretcher, no focusing is required, thus radiation damage is minimized and the surface forces are not limited by the light power. The magnitude of the deforming forces in the optical stretcher thus bridges the gap between optical tweezers and atomic force microscopy for the study of biologic materials.

Indexed as

Lasers3T3 CellsAlgorithmsAnimalsCell SizeCytoskeletonElasticityErythrocytesFibroblastsHumansMiceMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastMicrospheresSilicon DioxideViscositySilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID11463624
PMCPMC1301552
OpenAlexW2128193911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.