Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11459963›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

Evidence that replication fork components catalyze establishment of cohesion between sister chromatids.

D R Carson, M F Christman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Yeast nuclear RNA processing.World journal of biological chemistry · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Evidence that human blastomere cleavage is under unique cell cycle control.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2009
    Article
  7. Article
  8. DNA polymerase epsilon: a polymerase of unusual size (and complexity).Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology · 2008
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D R CarsonDepartment of Microbiology, Box 800734, Jordan Hall, 1300 Jefferson Park Avenue, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
M F Christman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate chromosome segregation requires that replicated sister chromatids are held together until anaphase, when their "cohesion" is dissolved, and they are pulled to opposite spindle poles by microtubules. Establishment of new cohesion between sister chromatids in the next cell cycle is coincident with replication fork passage. Emerging evidence suggests that this temporal coupling is not just a coincident timing of independent events, but rather that the establishment of cohesion is likely to involve the active participation of replication-related activities. These include PCNA, a processivity clamp for some DNA polymerases, Trf4/Pol final sigma (formerly Trf4/Pol kappa), a novel and essential DNA polymerase, and a modified Replication Factor C clamp--loader complex. Here we describe recent advances in how cohesion establishment is linked to replication, highlight important unanswered questions in this new field, and describe a "polymerase switch" model for how cohesion establishment is coupled to replication fork progression. Building the bridges between newly synthesized sister chromatids appears to be a fundamental but previously unrecognized function of the eukaryotic replication machinery.

Indexed as

Chondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansChromatidsDNA ReplicationNuclear ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBinding SitesCatalysisCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IIIFungal ProteinsHumansSaccharomyces cerevisiaeS PhaseStructural Maintenance of Chromosome Protein 1Cell Cycle ProteinsChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IIIFungal ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPAP2 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSMC3 protein, humanSMC3 protein, S cerevisiaeStructural Maintenance of Chromosome Protein 1TENT4A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID11459963
PMCPMC37431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.