Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11458482›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2001

Individualised multifactorial lifestyle intervention trial for high-risk cardiovascular patients in primary care.

E Ketola, M Mäkelä, M Klockars

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Lifestyle interventions in primary care: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Is a targeted and planned GP intervention effective in cardiovascular disease prevention? A randomized controlled trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Impact of lifestyle modification on absolute cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review protocol.JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E KetolaNorthern Health Care Centre, Helsinki, Finland. e.ketola@pp.fimnet.fi
M Mäkelä
M Klockars

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe multiprofessional teams in Finnish health centres are well placed to carry out interventions aimed at the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of an individually tailored multifactorial lifestyle intervention in primary care for individuals at high risk for cardiovascular disease. DESIGN OF STUDY: A randomised controlled trial was conducted over 24 months with interim assessments at six and 12 months.

settingA health centre in Finland with a patient population of 11,000.

methodOne hundred and fifty adults aged 18 to 65 years old with existing cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors were randomised to active multiprofessional risk factor intervention or to standard care. The main outcome measure was a change in cardiovascular risk-factor score. Secondary outcomes were changes in blood pressure, weight, body-mass index, serum cholesterol, blood glucose, smoking cessation, and exercise habits.

resultsThe cardiovascular risk score decreased by 28% in the intervention group (23% in the control group), body weight decreased by 3.7% (2%) and total cholesterol decreased by 10.8% (6.5%), while time engaged in exercise increased by 39% (43%). Differences were not significant.

conclusionsCardiovascular risk levels of high-risk individuals decreased in both intervention and control groups. Primary care prevention should be targeted to high-risk persons. Long-term follow-up studies are needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBlood PressureBody WeightCardiovascular DiseasesFamily PracticeFemaleFinlandHealth EducationHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care Team

Identifiers

PMID11458482
PMCPMC1313979
OpenAlexW1877796573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.