ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2001
Risks--listen and don't mislead.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Communicating risk to patients and the public.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012Article
- Shared decision-making based on different features of risk in the context of diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2007Article
- Identifying and managing patients at low risk of bowel cancer in general practice.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Review
- Patients' understanding of risk associated with medication use: impact of European Commission guidelines and other risk scales.Drug safety · 2003Review
- Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.Quality in health care : QHC · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11458474PMC1313971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.