Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11451689›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001

Efficacy of linezolid in treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

C F Dailey, C L Dileto-Fang, L V Buchanan, M P Oramas-Shirey, D H Batts, C W Ford, J K Gibson

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Occurrence of MRSA endocarditis during linezolid treatment.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2003
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C F DaileyPharmacology, Pharmacia, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001, USA. cfdailey@Pharmacia.com
C L Dileto-Fang
L V Buchanan
M P Oramas-Shirey
D H Batts
C W Ford
J K Gibson
Michigan United · USOffice of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacies of orally (p.o.) dosed linezolid and intravenously (i.v.) dosed vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in rabbits with experimental aortic-valve endocarditis were investigated. After endocarditis was established with a recent clinical MRSA isolate, rabbits were dosed for 5 days with linezolid (p.o., three times a day) at either 25, 50, or 75 mg/kg of body weight or vancomycin (i.v., twice a day) at 25 mg/kg. The 25-mg/kg linezolid group had a high mortality rate and bacterial counts in the valve vegetations that were not different from those of the controls. Linezolid dosed p.o. at 50 and 75 mg/kg and i.v. vancomycin produced statistically significant reductions in bacterial counts compared to those of the untreated controls. The reduced bacterial counts and culture-negative valve rates for the animals treated with linezolid at 75 mg/kg were similar to those for the vancomycin-treated animals. Concentrations of linezolid in plasma were determined at several points in the dosing regimen. These results suggest that the efficacy of linezolid in this infection model is related to trough levels in plasma that remain above the MIC for this microorganism. At the ineffective dose of linezolid (25 mg/kg) the concentration at sacrifice was 0.045 times the MIC, whereas the concentrations of linezolid in plasma in the 50- and 75-mg/kg groups were 2 and 5 times the MIC at sacrifice, respectively. The results from this experimental model suggest that the oxazolidinone linezolid may be effective for the treatment of serious staphylococcal infections when resistance to other antimicrobials is present.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceAcetamidesAdministration, OralAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAortic ValveColony Count, MicrobialEndocarditis, BacterialHeart Valve DiseasesKidneyLinezolidMethicillinMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOxazolidinonesRabbitsStaphylococcal InfectionsAcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolidMethicillinOxazolidinonesVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID11451689
PMCPMC90646
OpenAlexW2132158221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.