Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11449003›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2001

Multiple cadherin extracellular repeats mediate homophilic binding and adhesion.

S Chappuis-Flament, E Wong, L D Hicks, C M Kay, B M Gumbiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structural Insights into Ordered Multicomponent Assemblies in Cell Junctions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Engineering the Interactions of Classical Cadherin Cell-Cell Adhesion Proteins.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. δ-Protocadherins: Organizers of neural circuit assembly.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S Chappuis-FlamentCellular Biochemistry and Biophysics Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021, USA.
E Wong
L D Hicks
C M Kay
B M Gumbiner

Funding

BIOCHEMISTRY AND REGULATION OF CADHERIN ACTIVITYR01GM052717 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI GUMBINER, BARRY M. · 1996 to 2011
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30-CA-08784NIGMS NIH HHS GM52717NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular homophilic-binding domain of the cadherins consists of 5 cadherin repeats (EC1-EC5). Studies on cadherin specificity have implicated the NH(2)-terminal EC1 domain in the homophilic binding interaction, but the roles of the other extracellular cadherin (EC) domains have not been evaluated. We have undertaken a systematic analysis of the binding properties of the entire cadherin extracellular domain and the contributions of the other EC domains to homophilic binding. Lateral (cis) dimerization of the extracellular domain is thought to be required for adhesive function. Sedimentation analysis of the soluble extracellular segment of C-cadherin revealed that it exists in a monomer-dimer equilibrium with an affinity constant of approximately 64 microm. No higher order oligomers were detected, indicating that homophilic binding between cis-dimers is of significantly lower affinity. The homophilic binding properties of a series of deletion constructs, lacking successive or individual EC domains fused at the COOH terminus to an Fc domain, were analyzed using a bead aggregation assay and a cell attachment-based adhesion assay. A protein with only the first two NH(2)-terminal EC domains (CEC1-2Fc) exhibited very low activity compared with the entire extracellular domain (CEC1-5Fc), demonstrating that EC1 alone is not sufficient for effective homophilic binding. CEC1-3Fc exhibited high activity, but not as much as CEC1-4Fc or CEC1-5Fc. EC3 is not required for homophilic binding, however, since CEC1-2-4Fc and CEC1-2-4-5Fc exhibited high activity in both assays. These and experiments using additional EC combinations show that many, if not all, the EC domains contribute to the formation of the cadherin homophilic bond, and specific one-to-one interaction between particular EC domains may not be required. These conclusions are consistent with a previous study on direct molecular force measurements between cadherin ectodomains demonstrating multiple adhesive interactions (Sivasankar, S., W. Brieher, N. Lavrik, B. Gumbiner, and D. Leckband. 1999. PROC: Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:11820-11824; Sivasankar, S., B. Gumbiner, and D. Leckband. 2001. Biophys J. 80:1758-68). We propose new models for how the cadherin extracellular repeats may contribute to adhesive specificity and function.

Indexed as

AnimalsCadherinsCell AdhesionCHO CellsCricetinaeDimerizationFlow CytometryKineticsPlasmidsProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTime FactorsXenopusCadherinsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11449003
PMCPMC2196848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.