Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11444725›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2001

Comparative tolerability of pharmacological treatments for patent ductus arteriosus.

C Hammerman, M Kaplan

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacoeconomics of Surgical Interventions vs. Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2007
    Article
  6. Patent ductus arteriosus: pathophysiology and management.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2006
    Review
  7. Indomethacin and renal impairment in neonates.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2004
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C HammermanDepartment of Neonatology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. cathy@cc.huji.ac.il
M Kaplan
Shaare Zedek Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ductus arteriosus is a vascular channel which, although vital to the fetal circulation, rapidly becomes unnecessary and even deleterious after birth. As such, it is 'preprogrammed' to constrict within the first few hours of life. In infants born prematurely this natural closure is often delayed and/or ineffective. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge of the delicately orchestrated control of normal ductal closure, with emphasis on the role of various biochemical mediators. The major focus of this review, however, is on pharmacological approaches designed to prevent and/or treat the persistently patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) which often fails to constrict spontaneously in the premature infant. The standard treatment regimen is based on the administration of 3 doses of the nonselective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin. We begin by examining, from the vantage point of the ductus, the use of this indomethacin as a tocolytic. It seems that antenatal administration of indomethacin can cause transient, reversible ductus constriction which renders the post-treatment ductus resistant to subsequent closure, both natural and therapeutic. We then review some of the pros and cons associated with the prophylactic administration of indomethacin. Although prophylactic indomethacin is aimed primarily at preventing intraventricular haemorrhages in premature neonates, it does tend to reduce the risk of PDA as well. We then describe some novel therapeutic approaches to effect ductal closure with indomethacin, including the use of continuous infusions to minimise toxic vasoconstrictive phenomena and the use of prolonged maintenance dose to prevent PDA recurrences. Finally we discuss some of the newer agents described more recently which play a role in closing the persistently patent ductus over the next decade. Most prominent of these is ibuprofen which some studies have shown to have less undesirable vasoconstrictive adverse effects. Studies which compare the use of ibuprofen to indomethacin are summarised.

Indexed as

Cyclooxygenase InhibitorsDuctus Arteriosus, PatentHumansIbuprofenIndomethacinInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureCyclooxygenase InhibitorsIbuprofenIndomethacin

Identifiers

PMID11444725
OpenAlexW1996860839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.