ReviewImmunologic research2001
Mucosal T cell response to reovirus.
Review in Immunologic research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leukocyte-derived IFN-α/β and epithelial IFN-λ constitute a compartmentalized mucosal defense system that restricts enteric virus infections.PLoS pathogens · 2015Article
- Engineering recombinant reoviruses with tandem repeats and a tetravirus 2A-like element for exogenous polypeptide expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Reovirus serotypes elicit distinctive patterns of recall immunity in humans.Journal of virology · 2008Article
- Upregulation of ICOS on CD43+ CD4+ murine small intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes during acute reovirus infection.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2006Article
- Experimental intestinal reovirus infection of mice: what we know, what we need to know.Immunologic research · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the last three decades, immunologists and gastroenterologists have witnessed the formation of mucosal immunology as a discipline in biomedical science, and studies of reovirus infection have substantially contributed to this evolution. We have focused on mucosal T cell responses induced by reovirus in conventional, germfree, nude, and NF-kappaB deficient mice. Several major facets of T cell function in the immune responses to this mucosal pathogen have been examined, including viral selection of oligoclonal-T cells, extrathymic T cell development, and distinct signaling pathways used by CD8 sublineages. In addition, our findings with virus-specific T cells selected in the mucosa have suggested novel mechanisms for the rearrangement, selection, and expansion of TCR genes. With the increasing application of molecular tools, reovirus will continue to be a useful model pathogen to study mucosal immunology and will further our understanding of mucosal immunity in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.