Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11438642›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2001

New model for the yeast RNA polymerase I transcription cycle.

P Aprikian, B Moorefield, R H Reeder

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P AprikianFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
B Moorefield
R H Reeder
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

CONTROL OF RIBOSOMAL GENE TRANSCRIPTIONR01GM026624 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI REEDER, RONALD H · 1985 to 2001
$874k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM26624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using an immobilized template assay, we observed two steps in assembly of the yeast RNA polymerase I (Pol I) preinitiation complex: stable binding of upstream activating factor (UAF) followed by recruitment of Pol I-Rrn3p and core factor (CF). Pol I is required for stable association of CF with the promoter and can be recruited in the absence of Rrn3p. Upon transcription initiation, Pol I-Rrn3p and CF dissociate from the promoter while UAF remains behind. These findings support a novel model in which the Pol I basal machinery cycles on and off the promoter with each round of transcription. This model accounts for previous observations that rRNA synthesis may be controlled by regulating both promoter accessibility and polymerase activity.

Indexed as

Pol1 Transcription Initiation Complex ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription, GeneticBlotting, WesternCore Binding Factor alpha SubunitsDNA-Binding ProteinsEnzyme ActivationModels, BiologicalPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingRNA Polymerase IRNA, RibosomalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTemperatureTime FactorsTranscription Factorscore binding factor alphaCore Binding Factor alpha SubunitsDNA-Binding ProteinsPol1 Transcription Initiation Complex ProteinsRNA Polymerase IRNA, RibosomalRRN3 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factorsupstream activation factor, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID11438642
PMCPMC87188
OpenAlexW2103667883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.