Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11437275›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2001

Use of epitope tags for routine analysis of transgene expression.

C M Alarcon, A R Umthun, J C Register

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C M AlarconTrait and Technology Development, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Johnston, IA 50131, USA.
A R Umthun
J C Register
Pioneer Hi-Bred · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide and RNA epitope tags as tools for routine analysis of transgene expression and protein accumulation in transformed plant cell cultures was evaluated using three genes that encode very structurally and functionally different proteins. A T7 peptide was introduced at the amino- and carboxyl-termini of phosphinothricin-N-acetyl transferase and avidin and at the carboxyl-terminus of galactose oxidase. An RNA sequence that forms a higher order structure that is recognized by antibodies raised against the FLAG peptide was separately introduced into the 3' nontranslated region of these genes. Constructs were introduced into maize cell cultures using particle bombardment and transgene expression, protein accumulation, protein function and presence of the tags in RNA and/or protein as appropriate were evaluated in up to approximately 25 culture lines per construct. Results indicate that, while there will likely always be a need for some empirical evaluation of any tag-protein combination, introduction of the peptide tag at the amino-terminus was generally more successful than was incorporation at the carboxyl-terminus. RNA tags show promise for this purpose, but routine application will require development of a very sensitive immunoassay.

Indexed as

AcetyltransferasesAnimalsAvidinBiolisticsBlotting, WesternChickensEpitopesFungiGalactose OxidaseGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterGenetic VectorsImmunoassayPlants, Genetically ModifiedRecombinant Fusion ProteinsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAcetyltransferasesAvidinEpitopesGalactose Oxidasephosphinothricin N-acetyltransferaseRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID11437275
OpenAlexW65172141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.