Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11435410›Full record

ArticleGenome research2001

High-throughput plasmid purification for capillary sequencing.

C J Elkin, P M Richardson, H M Fourcade, N M Hammon, M J Pollard, P F Predki, T Glavina, T L Hawkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Phylogenetics and genetic variation ofJournal of nematology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intron presence-absence polymorphisms in Daphnia.Molecular biology and evolution · 2008
    Article
  8. Ameiotic recombination in asexual lineages of Daphnia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C J ElkinDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
P M Richardson
H M Fourcade
N M Hammon
M J Pollard
P F Predki
T Glavina
T L Hawkins
Joint Genome Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for expeditious and inexpensive methods for high-throughput DNA sequencing has been highlighted by the accelerated pace of genome DNA sequencing over the past year. At the Joint Genome Institute, the throughput in terms of high-quality bases per day has increased over 20-fold during the past 18 mo, reaching an average of 18.3 million bases per day. To support this unprecedented scaleup, we developed an inexpensive automated method for the isolation and purification of double-stranded plasmid DNA clones for sequencing that is tailored to meet the more stringent needs of the newer capillary electrophoresis DNA sequencing machines. The protocol is based on the magnetic bead method of solid phase reversible immobilization that has been automated by using a CRS-based robotic system. The method described here has enabled us to meet our increases in production while reducing labor and materials costs significantly.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNA, CircularElectrophoresis, CapillaryGenetic VectorsHumansMolecular Sequence DataPlasmidsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Circular

Identifiers

PMID11435410
PMCPMC311127
OpenAlexW2046314822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.