Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11435405›Full record

ArticleGenome research2001

An efficient and robust statistical modeling approach to discover differentially expressed genes using genomic expression profiles.

J G Thomas, J M Olson, S J Tapscott, L P Zhao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. T-type voltage-gated channels, NaCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J G ThomasDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA.
J M Olson
S J Tapscott
L P Zhao

Funding

Use of Biomarkers in Diagnosis, Prognosis, Risk Prediction and Early Detection ofP01CA053996 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HSU, LI · 1991 to 2015
$9.4M
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGYR01GM058897 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMAS, DUNCAN C. · 2000 to 2003
$2.0M
METHODS/PROGRAMS FOR MAPPING COMPLEX DISEASESR01HG002283 · NHGRI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ZHAO, LUE PING NA · 2000 to 2002
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA53996NCI NIH HHS P01 CA053996NHGRI NIH HHS HG02283NIGMS NIH HHS GM58897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a statistical regression modeling approach to discover genes that are differentially expressed between two predefined sample groups in DNA microarray experiments. Our model is based on well-defined assumptions, uses rigorous and well-characterized statistical measures, and accounts for the heterogeneity and genomic complexity of the data. In contrast to cluster analysis, which attempts to define groups of genes and/or samples that share common overall expression profiles, our modeling approach uses known sample group membership to focus on expression profiles of individual genes in a sensitive and robust manner. Further, this approach can be used to test statistical hypotheses about gene expression. To demonstrate this methodology, we compared the expression profiles of 11 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 27 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) samples from a previous study (Golub et al. 1999) and found 141 genes differentially expressed between AML and ALL with a 1% significance at the genomic level. Using this modeling approach to compare different sample groups within the AML samples, we identified a group of genes whose expression profiles correlated with that of thrombopoietin and found that genes whose expression associated with AML treatment outcome lie in recurrent chromosomal locations. Our results are compared with those obtained using t-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum statistics.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticModels, StatisticalAcute DiseaseGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLeukemia, MyeloidOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID11435405
PMCPMC311075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.