ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2001
Whipple's disease and "Tropheryma whippelii".
Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 251 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whipple's disease with multiple serous effusions as the clinical manifestation: a case report and literature review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Review
- Article
- Tropheryma whipplei: An Underestimated Pathogen Associated with Pulmonary Infections?Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Article
- Whipple Disease Initial Presentation as Supraclavicular Lymphadenopathy in a Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Diagnostic Challenge.International journal of surgical pathology · 2025Article
- Spondylodiscitis revealing Whipple disease.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Eyelid abscess as an initial manifestation of whipple's disease: a case report and comprehensive literature review.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Whipple's disease of the respiratory system: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- An Incidental Finding of Whipple's Disease Masquerading as Nonspecific, Long-Standing Symptoms.Case reports in infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Co-infection ofWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Article
- Whipple's Disease: A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
- [Massive pancarditis-autopsy report].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Advancing Microbe Detection for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection Diagnosis and Management with Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Whipple's disease review, prevalence, mortality, and characteristics in the United States: A cross-sectional national inpatient study.Medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Design of a Multi-Epitope Vaccine againstVaccines · 2022Article
- Delayed Diagnosis of Whipple's Disease Complicated by Jarisch-Herxheimer Reaction to Ceftriaxone Treatment: A Case Report and Literature Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
- Isolated central nervous system Whipple disease.Surgical neurology international · 2022Review
- Whipple's disease? A case report and discussion.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2021Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whipple's disease is a rare bacterial infection that may involve any organ system in the body. It occurs primarily in Caucasian males older than 40 years. The gastrointestinal tract is the most frequently involved organ, with manifestations such as abdominal pain, malabsorption syndrome with diarrhea, and weight loss. Other signs include low-grade fever, lymphadenopathy, skin hyperpigmentation, endocarditis, pleuritis, seronegative arthritis, uveitis, spondylodiscitis, and neurological manifestations, and these signs may occur in the absence of gastrointestinal manifestations. Due to the wide variability of manifestations, clinical diagnosis is very difficult and is often made only years or even decades after the initial symptoms have appeared. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for at least 1 year is usually considered adequate to eradicate the infection. The microbiological diagnosis of this insidious disease is rendered difficult by the virtual lack of culture and serodiagnostic methods. It is usually based on the demonstration of periodic acid-Schiff-positive particles in infected tissues and/or the presence of bacteria with an unusual trilaminar cell wall ultrastructure by electron microscopy. Recently, the Whipple bacteria have been characterized at the molecular level by amplification of their 16S rRNA gene(s). Phylogenetic analysis of these sequences revealed a new bacterial species related to the actinomycete branch which was named "Tropheryma whippelli." Based on its unique 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence, species-specific primers were selected for the detection of the organism in clinical specimens by PCR. This technique is currently used as one of the standard methods for establishing the diagnosis of Whipple's disease. Specific and broad-spectrum PCR amplifications mainly but not exclusively from extraintestinal specimens have significantly improved diagnosis, being more sensitive than histopathologic analysis. However, "T. whippelii" DNA has also been found in persons without clinical and histological evidence of Whipple's disease. It is unclear whether these patients are true asymptomatic carriers or whether differences in virulence exist among strains of "T. whippelii" that might account for the variable clinical manifestations. So far, six different "T. whippelii" subtypes have been found by analysis of their 16S-23S rDNA spacer region. Further studies of the pathogen "T. whippelii" as well as the host immune response are needed to fully understand this fascinating disease. The recent cultivation of the organisms is a promising major step in this direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.