Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11432536›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2001

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the rifamycin antibacterials.

W J Burman, K Gallicano, C Peloquin

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 130 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00474435 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2008, after this paper: background citation

The Pharmacokinetics of Co-formulated Emtricitabine/Tenofovir/Efavirenz in HIV-infected Patients With Smear-positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania

TypeinterventionalSponsorAfrican Poverty Related Infection Oriented Research InitiativeRan2008 to 2009Enrolled30ConditionsTuberculosis, HIV InfectionsArmsEmtricitabine/tenofovir/efavirenz
NCT00760149 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of High Versus Standard Dose Rifampicin in Patients With Pulmonary Tuberculosis in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2010 to 2013Enrolled150ConditionsTuberculosisArmsRifampicin in higher doses
NCT02563327 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

TBTC Study 31 PK/PD: Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Rifapentine and Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Tuberculosis in the Study 31 Treatment Trial: Intensive PK Sampling

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRan2016 to 2021Enrolled2,516ConditionsTuberculosisArmsRifapentine, Moxifloxacin, Rifampin, Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide
NCT05454345 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Study for Shortening Tuberculosis Treatment With Sitafloxacin-Containing Regimens

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled620ConditionsTuberculosis, PulmonaryArmsSitafloxacin, SMZ/TMP, Rifampin, Pyrazinamide, Rifapentine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 334 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Rifabutin for treating pulmonary tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Two-stage activity-safety study of daily rifapentine during intensive phase treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2015
    Trial
  12. Daily rifapentine for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. A randomized, dose-ranging trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2015
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

W J BurmanDepartment of Public Health, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, USA. bburman@dhha.org
K Gallicano
C Peloquin
Health and Hospital Corporation · USNational Jewish Health · USOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

PHARMACOKINETICS OF ANTITUBERCULOSIS DRUGSR01AI037845 · NIAID · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI PELOQUIN, CHARLES ARTHUR · 1995 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI37845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rifamycin antibacterials, rifampicin (rifampin), rifabutin and rifapentine, are uniquely potent in the treatment of patients with tuberculosis and chronic staphylococcal infections. Absorption is variably affected by food; the maximal concentration of rifampicin is decreased by food, whereas rifapentine absorption is increased in the presence of food. The rifamycins are well-known inducers of enzyme systems involved in the metabolism of many drugs, most notably those metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. The relative potency of the rifamycins as CYP3A inducers is rifampin > rifapentine > rifabutin; rifabutin is also a CYP3A substrate. The antituberculosis activity of rifampicin is decreased by a modest dose reduction from 600 to 450mg. This somewhat surprising finding may be due to the binding of rifampicin to serum proteins, limiting free, active concentrations of the drug. However, increasing the administration interval (after the first 2 to 8 weeks of therapy) has little effect on the sterilising activity of rifampicin, suggesting that relatively brief exposures to a critical concentration of rifampicin are sufficient to kill intermittently metabolising mycobacterial populations. The high protein binding of rifapentine (97%) may explain the suboptimal efficacy of the currently recommended dose of this drug. The toxicity of rifampicin is related to dose and administration interval, with increasing rates of presumed hypersensitivity with higher doses combined with administration frequency of once weekly or less. Rifabutin toxicity is related to dose and concomitant use of CYP3A inhibitors. The rifamycins illustrate the complexity of predicting the pharmacodynamics of treatment of an intracellular pathogen with the capacity for dormancy.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsRifamycinsArea Under CurveDrug InteractionsDrug MonitoringHalf-LifeHumansIntestinal AbsorptionAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifamycins

Identifiers

PMID11432536
OpenAlexW2089663335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.