ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001
Antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole by flow cytometry correlates with clinical outcome.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phytochemical profiling and bioactivity assessment of the ethanol extract of Lannea schimperi bark: antioxidant, antiradical, and antimicrobial potentials.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Early phenotypic detection of fluconazole- and anidulafungin-resistant Candida glabrata isolates.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Rapid susceptibility testing and microcolony analysis of Candida spp. cultured and imaged on porous aluminum oxide.PloS one · 2012Article
- Susceptibility tests of oropharyngeal Candida albicans from egyptian patients to fluconazole determined by three methods.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2012Article
- Conidial viability assay for rapid susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Susceptibility testing of fungi by flow cytometry (also called fluorescence-activated cell sorting [FACS]) using vital staining with FUN-1 showed a good correlation with the standard M27-A procedure for assessing MICs. In this study we determined MICs for blood culture isolates from patients with candidemia by NCCLS M27-A and FACS methods and correlated the clinical outcome of these patients with in vitro antifungal resistance test results. A total of 24 patients with candidemia for whom one or more blood cultures were positive for a Candida sp. were included. Susceptibility testing was performed by NCCLS M27-A and FACS methods. The correlation of MICs (NCCLS M27-A and FACS) and clinical outcome was calculated. In 83% of the cases, the MICs of fluconazole determined by FACS were within 1 dilution of the MICs determined by the NCCLS M27-A method. For proposed susceptibility breakpoints, there was 100% agreement between the M27-A and FACS methods. In the FACS assay, a fluconazole MIC of <1 microg/ml was associated with cure (P < 0.001) whereas an MIC of > or =1 microg/ml was associated with death (P < 0.001). The M27-A-derived fluconazole MICs did not correlate with outcome (P = 1 and P = 0.133).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.