Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11423011›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2001

Evolution of mammalian genome organization inferred from comparative gene mapping.

W J Murphy, R Stanyon, S J O'Brien

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Speciation with gene flow in equids despite extensive chromosomal plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  18. Common variants in PARK loci and related genes and Parkinson's disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W J MurphyLaboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702-1201, USA. murphywi@mail.ncifcrf.gov
R Stanyon
S J O'Brien

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genome analyses, including chromosome painting in over 40 diverse mammalian species, ordered gene maps from several representatives of different mammalian and vertebrate orders, and large-scale sequencing of the human and mouse genomes are beginning to provide insight into the rates and patterns of chromosomal evolution on a whole-genome scale, as well as into the forces that have sculpted the genomes of extant mammalian species.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularGenomeAnimalsChromosome PaintingHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID11423011
PMCPMC138942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.