Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11422632›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2001

Relation of physician specialty and HIV/AIDS experience to choice of guideline-recommended antiretroviral therapy.

V E Stone, F F Mansourati, R M Poses, K H Mayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Qualifications, Demographics, Satisfaction, and Future Capacity of the HIV Care Provider Workforce in the United States, 2013-2014.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antiretroviral medication errors remain high but are quickly corrected among hospitalized HIV-infected adults.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Medical speciality and pattern of medicines prescription.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2004
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V E StoneDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI, USA. vstone@partners.org
F F Mansourati
R M Poses
K H Mayer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy exists regarding who should provide care for those with HIV/AIDS. While previous studies have found an association between physician HIV experience and patient outcomes, less is known about the relationship of physician specialty to HIV/AIDS outcomes or quality of care.

objectiveTo examine the relationship between choice of appropriate antiretroviral therapy (ART) to physician specialty and HIV/AIDS experience.

designSelf-administered physician survey.

participantsRandom sample of 2,478 internal medicine (IM) and infectious disease (ID) physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Choice of guideline-recommended ART.

resultsTwo patients with HIV disease, differing only by CD4+ count and HIV RNA load, were presented. Respondents were asked whether ART was indicated, and if so, what ART regimen they would choose. Respondents' ART choices were categorized as "recommended" or not by Department of Health and Human Services guidelines. Respondents' HIV/AIDS experience was categorized as moderate to high (MOD/HI) or none to low (NO/LO). For Case 1, 72.9% of responding physicians chose recommended ART. Recommended ART was more likely (P <.01) to be chosen by ID physicians (88.2%) than by IM physicians (57.1%). Physicians with MOD/HI experience were also more likely (P <.01) to choose recommended ART than those with NO/LO experience. Finally, choice of ART was examined using logistic regression: specialty and HIV experience were found to be independent predictors of choosing recommended ART (for ID physicians, odds ratio [OR], 4.66; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.15 to 6.90; and for MOD/HI experience, OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.33 to 3.16). Results for Case 2 were similar. When the analysis was repeated excluding physicians who indicated they would refer the HIV "patient," specialty and HIV experience were not significant predictors of choosing recommended ART.

conclusionsGuideline-recommended ART appears to be less likely to be chosen by generalists and physicians with less HIV/AIDS experience, although many of these physicians report they would refer these patients in clinical practice. These results lend support to current recommendations for routine expert consultant input in the management of those with HIV/AIDS.

Indexed as

SpecializationAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveData CollectionEducation, MedicalFemaleGuideline AdherenceHIV InfectionsHumansInternal MedicineMaleMedicinePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Venereology

Identifiers

PMID11422632
PMCPMC1495224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.