Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11422021›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2001

A 6-month large-scale study into the safety of tamsulosin.

M C Michel, H U Bressel, M Goepel, H Rübben

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Antagonism of prostate αThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. How doAfrican health sciences · 2018
    Article
  9. Tamsulosin induced diarrhea: a case report.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Drug-drug interactions in urology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2009
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M C MichelDepartments of Medicine and Urology, University of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany. martin.michel@uni-essen.de
H U Bressel
M Goepel
H Rübben
Essen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTamsulosin is an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia with a tolerability similar to that of placebo in short-term, placebo-controlled studies with limited patient numbers. The present study was designed to test the safety of tamsulosin treatment in a large cohort of men during a prolonged period of time, particularly with regard to comedications.

methodsA multicentre, open-label phase IIIb study with 1784 patients receiving 0.4 mg o.d. tamsulosin for 6 months was performed according to good clinical practice guidelines. The analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis and powered to detect adverse events (AE) occurring in 0.15% of patients with 95% confidence.

resultsDuring a total drug exposure time of 811 patient years, 386 AE were recorded in 253 patients (14.2%; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 12.0-15.2%). Twenty-nine patients suffered 44 serious AE including five fatal events (CI 0.12-0.73%) due to myocardial infarction (n = 3) and to pneumonia and a car accident (one each), but all deaths were judged to be unlikely to be related to study medication. The frequency of AE in patients without any comedication (n = 1095) was 13.0% (CI 11.3-14.9%). In a logistic regression analysis beta-adrenoceptor blockers, converting enzyme inhibitors, antidiabetics and diuretics did not significantly affect the odds ratio for having AE. However, concomitant alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists (a protocol violation) and treatment with verapamil (which also has alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist activity) significantly enhanced the odds ratio for having AE to 3.87 (CI 1.52-9.85) and 3.17 (CI 1.52-6.58), respectively. Minor increases in the odds ratio, which did not reach statistical significance, were also observed for Ca2+ antagonists other than verapamil and for nitrates.

conclusionsWe conclude that tamsulosin has a good safety profile relative to AE rates in the placebo arms of previous studies on tamsulosin even in the presence of most potentially complicating comedications. No major unexpected severe AE were recorded during our 6 months study.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-AntagonistsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioProstatic HyperplasiaReceptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1SulfonamidesTamsulosinAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsReceptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1SulfonamidesTamsulosinVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID11422021
PMCPMC2014481
OpenAlexW1983753228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.