Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11421348›Full record

ArticleGlycoconjugate journal

Progress in deciphering the information content of the 'glycome'--a crescendo in the closing years of the millennium.

T Feizi

Abstract readAutobiographyBiographyHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Glycoconjugate journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Protein biomarkers in cancer: natural glycoprotein microarray approaches.Current opinion in molecular therapeutics · 2008
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plant proteomics: BLASTing out of a MudPIT.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

T FeiziThe Glycosciences Laboratory, Imperial College School of Medicine, Harrow, United Kingdom. t.feizi@ic.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The closing years of the second millennium have been uplifting for carbohydrate biology. Optimism that oligosaccharide sequences are bearers of crucial biological information has been borne out by the constellation of efforts of carbohydrate chemists, biochemists, immunochemists, and cell- and molecular biologists. The direct involvement of specific oligosaccharide sequences in protein targeting and folding, and in mechanisms of infection, inflammation and immunity is now unquestioned. With the emergence of families of proteins with carbohydrate-binding activities, assignments of information content for defined oligosaccharide sequences will become more common, but the pinpointing and elucidation of the bioactive domains on oligosaccharides will continue to pose challenges even to the most experienced carbohydrate biologists. The neoglycolipid technology incorporates some of the key requirements for this challenge: namely the resolution of complex glycan mixtures, and ligand binding coupled with sequence determination by mass spectrometry.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBlood Group AntigensCarbohydratesCarbohydrate SequenceEnglandHistory, 20th CenturyHumansLectinsLigandsMolecular Sequence DataOligosaccharidesSelectinsAntibodies, MonoclonalBlood Group AntigensCarbohydratesLectinsLigandsOligosaccharidesSelectins

Identifiers

PMID11421348
OpenAlexW1261025307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.