Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11420728›Full record

ReviewOncogene2001

Transcription therapy for cancer.

P P Pandolfi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anti-Epileptic Drug Targets Ewing Sarcoma.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences and pharmacology · 2014
    Article
  13. Iron complexation to histone deacetylase inhibitors SAHA and LAQ824 in PEGylated liposomes can considerably improve pharmacokinetics in rats.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P P PandolfiDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Sloan-Kettering Division, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Cornell University, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the post genome era it will soon be possible to associate a specific tumor type with a specific gene expression profile and to define each molecular lesion characteristic of any given cancer. It is intuitive that a successful therapeutic strategy for cancer should aim at blocking the aberrant biochemical activity triggered by the oncogene or the lack of tumor suppressor gene activity that ultimately leads to full-blown neoplastic transformation. However, an attractive alternative approach entails the blockade of the transcriptional consequences of such oncogenic activities irrespective of their original biochemical nature, thus antagonizing the key transcriptional events underlying cancer pathogenesis in any specific neoplastic cellular population. This approach is now rendered possible by major advances along several lines of investigation: (i) the possibility of analysing gene expression through high throughput methods; (ii) a more detailed knowledge of the regulatory regions and of the transcription factors that control gene expression also facilitated in the future by a comprehensive whole genome comparative analysis of these regulatory sequences; (iii) the ability of modulating gene expression at the single gene level through various approaches both pharmacological and biochemical; (iv) the opportunity of directly antagonizing the aberrant activities of oncogenic transcription factors through a detailed knowledge of their abnormal transcriptional function; (v) the possibility of validating, in vivo, in animal models the relevance for neoplastic transformation of specific transcriptional events as well as of testing the efficacy of 'transcription therapy' in faithful animal models of human cancer. Here, we will review the facts, the existing applications and the hypothesis underlying such therapeutic modality for cancer therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLeukemia, Promyelocytic, AcuteNeoplasmsTranscription, GeneticTretinoinTretinoin

Identifiers

PMID11420728
OpenAlexW4244861043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.