Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11420717›Full record

ReviewOncogene2001

Histone H3 phosphorylation and cell division.

F Hans, S Dimitrov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 250 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
250citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

250 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Differential sensitivity of midline development to mitosis during and after primitive streak extension.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Spirocyclic β-lactone secondary metabolites modulate spliceosome function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Unveiling the developmental and tumor-suppressive roles of the p53 variant p53psi.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

190 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F HansLaboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire de la Différenciation, équipe Mécanismes d'Assemblage du Matériel Génétique, INSERM U 309, Institut Albert Bonniot, Domaine de la Merci, 38706 La Tronche, Cedex, France.
S Dimitrov

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone H3 is specifically phosphorylated during both mitosis and meiosis in patterns that are specifically coordinated in both space and time. Histone H3 phosphorylation may initiate at different phases of the cell division in different organisms, but metaphase chromosomes are always found to be heavily phosphorylated. Upon exit of mitosis/meiosis a global dephosphorylation of H3 takes place. Potential candidates for H3 kinases are described and their hypothetical mechanism of action on highly condensed chromatin templates is discussed. In addition, a novel hypothesis for the role of histone H3 phosphorylation during cell division is proposed. This hypothesis, termed the 'ready production label' model, explains the results in the literature and suggests that phosphorylation of histone H3 is a part of a complex signaling mechanism.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DivisionHistonesHumansPhosphorylationHistones

Identifiers

PMID11420717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.