Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11420207›Full record

ReviewArchives of disease in childhood2001

Recent advances in cystic fibrosis.

I J Doull

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of disease in childhood, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Infection in lung transplantation].Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica · 2007
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Method for detection of respiratory viruses in the sputa of patients with cystic fibrosis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2005
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Strategic challenges in neurotherapeutic pharmaceutical development.NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2004
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules.Archives of disease in childhood · 2001
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

I J DoullCystic Fibrosis/Respiratory Unit, Department of Child Health, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK. doullij@cf.ac.uk
University Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The median life expectancy for cystic fibrosis is now over 30 years, and it is projected that in newborn infants it will become more than 40 years. The identification of the cystic fibrosis gene and its product, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), has widened the spectrum of the disease from the classical case of the infant with cystic fibrosis to the elderly childless man with unexplained bronchiectasis. There is increasing evidence of the advantages of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis and subsequent specialist care. Management concentrates on optimising nutritional status and preventing lung infection and inflammation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorDelivery of Health CareGenetic TestingGenetic TherapyGenotypeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLife ExpectancyAnti-Bacterial AgentsCFTR protein, humanCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorMacrolidesTobramycin

Identifiers

PMID11420207
PMCPMC1718852
OpenAlexW1907761738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.