Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11414478›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2001

Transgenic and knockout mouse models clarify pituitary development, function and disease.

S L Asa

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Somatotroph-SpecificJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2017
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

S L AsaDepartment of Pathology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. sylvia.asa@uhn.on.ca
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse models have been used to study various aspects of pituitary development, function and disease. Transgenic or knockout technology has been applied to examine the regulation of hormone gene expression and the pathophysiology of its alterations, to ascertain the factors that determine cell differentiation, and to manipulate oncogenesis. Transgenic mice have elucidated the necessary elements required for the tissue- and cell-specific expression of pituitary hormones. Transgenic and knockout technologies have derived mice with hormone overexpression or abrogation of hormone action, and have identified novel hormones. The role of precursor cells in cell differentiation has been confirmed by genetic ablation of cell lineages. Inactivation of transcription factors implicated in pituitary organogenesis and cytogenesis has proven their critical roles in pituitary development. Pituitary oncogenesis has been studied by promoter-directed oncogene expression or tumor suppressor gene ablation, by adenohypophysiotropic hormone overexpression, or by growth factor or receptor overexpression. The tumors have provided a number of cell lines for use in the continuing study of pituitary physiology and pathology. These models may also be used in the future to examine novel therapeutic strategies for the management of patients with pituitary disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell Transformation, NeoplasticFemaleGene DeletionGene Expression RegulationGenes, Tumor SuppressorGene TargetingGenetic TechniquesGrowth SubstancesHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemMaleMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicGrowth SubstancesNeoplasm ProteinsPituitary HormonesPro-Opiomelanocortin

Identifiers

PMID11414478
PMCPMC8098374
OpenAlexW2149113197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.