Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11413176›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2001

Relation of socioeconomic position to the case fatality, prognosis and treatment of myocardial infarction events; the FINMONICA MI Register Study.

V Salomaa, H Miettinen, M Niemelä, M Ketonen, M Mähönen, P Immonen-Räihä, S Lehto, T Vuorenmaa, S Koskinen, P Palomäki and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of income status on prognosis of acute coronary syndrome patients during Greek financial crisis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Case fatality of myocardial infarction among shift workers.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A novel socioeconomic measure using individual housing data in cardiovascular outcome research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V SalomaaKTL-National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland. veikko.salomaa@ktl.fi
H Miettinen
M Niemelä
M Ketonen
M Mähönen
P Immonen-Räihä
S Lehto
T Vuorenmaa
S Koskinen
P Palomäki
H Mustaniemi
E Kaarsalo
M Arstila
J Torppa
K Kuulasmaa
P Puska
K Pyörälä
J Tuomilehto
Central Finland Health Care District · FIInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine socioeconomic differences in case fatality and prognosis of myocardial infarction (MI) events, and to estimate the contributions of incidence and case fatality to socioeconomic differences in coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality.

designA population-based MI register study.

methodsThe FINMONICA MI Register recorded all MI events among persons aged 35-64 years in three areas of Finland during 1983-1992. A record linkage of the MI Register data with the files of Statistics Finland was performed to obtain information on socioeconomic indicators for each individual registered. First MI events (n=8427) were included in the analyses. MAIN

resultsThe adjusted risk ratio of prehospital coronary death was 2.11 (95% CI 1.82, 2.46) among men and 1.68 (1.14, 2.48) among women with low income compared with those with high income. Even among persons hospitalised alive the risk of death during the next 12 months was markedly higher in the low income group than in the high income group. Case fatality explained 51% of the CHD mortality difference between the low and the high income groups among men and 38% among women. Incidence contributed 49% and 62%, respectively.

conclusionsConsiderable socioeconomic differences were observed in the case fatality of first coronary events both before hospitalisation and among patients hospitalised alive. Case fatality explained a half of the CHD mortality difference between the low and the high income groups among men and more than a third among women.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceCohort StudiesCoronary DiseaseFemaleFinlandHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPrognosisRegistriesResidence CharacteristicsRisk FactorsSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID11413176
PMCPMC1731938
OpenAlexW2107752762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.