ArticleAtencion primaria2001
[Variation over two years of cardiovascular risk in patients cared for at primary care services for hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Durability of the effects of a quality improvement intervention in hypertensive patients on long-term follow-up (CICLO-RISK study)].Atencion primaria · 2009Article
- [Effectiveness of an intervention to improve quality care in reducing cardiovascular risk in hypertense patients].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
- [Calculation of coronary risk in the 35-60 year old population registered at a health centre].Atencion primaria · 2003Article
- [Detection of cardiovascular risk factors in the reformed primary care network in Catalonia. Comparison between the years 1995 and 2000].Atencion primaria · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyse the modifications in cardiovascular risk in patients seen over two years in adult services for dyslipaemia, diabetes mellitus or hypertension.
designObservational, retrospective study with repeated measurement tests.
settingTwo health centres. PATIENTS: 265 patients attended by the above services who were free of cardiovascular disease at the start of the study. MEASUREMENTS AND
resultsDuring the study period, the cumulative incidence of cardiovascular morbidity was 4.2% (1.8-6.6%). Patients, without events, underwent a mean reduction in overall cardiovascular risk of -1.6% (p < 0.001). In patients classified as high-risk at the start of the study, the mean reduction was much greater: -3.7% (p < 0.001). Giving up smoking and controlling dyslipaemia brought about the greatest reductions in cardiovascular risk.
conclusionsMonitoring of cardiovascular risk in patients attended for conditions in the INSALUD portfolio of services, i.e. hypertension, dyslipaemia, diabetes mellitus, enables this risk to be reduced and priority to be given to health care delivery to more vulnerable groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.