Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11410837›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of human genetics2001

Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data.

J K Pritchard, M Przeworski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of human genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 517 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
517citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

517 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Genetic Variation and Hot Flashes: A Systematic Review.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Imputing Phenotypes for Genome-wide Association Studies.American journal of human genetics · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Genomic evidence for shared common ancestry of East African hunting-gathering populations and insights into local adaptation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Breast cancer polygenic risk score performance varies by socioeconomic status.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genome writing and Targeted Delivery of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

457 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J K PritchardDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1-3TG, England. pritch@stats.ox.ac.uk
M Przeworski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we describe recent empirical and theoretical work on the extent of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the human genome, comparing the predictions of simple population-genetic models to available data. Several studies report significant LD over distances longer than those predicted by standard models, whereas some data from short, intergenic regions show less LD than would be expected. The apparent discrepancies between theory and data present a challenge-both to modelers and to human geneticists-to identify which important features are missing from our understanding of the biological processes that give rise to LD. Salient features may include demographic complications such as recent admixture, as well as genetic factors such as local variation in recombination rates, gene conversion, and the potential segregation of inversions. We also outline some implications that the emerging patterns of LD have for association-mapping strategies. In particular, we discuss what marker densities might be necessary for genomewide association scans.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationModels, GeneticChromosome MappingGenome, HumanHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, GeneticRecombination, GeneticSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID11410837
PMCPMC1226024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.