Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11408236›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001

Prospective study of Candida species in patients at a comprehensive cancer center.

A Safdar, V Chaturvedi, E W Cross, S Park, E M Bernard, D Armstrong, D S Perlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Diagnosis and Treatment Challenges ofCase reports in infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antifungal activity of liriodenine on agents of systemic mycoses, with emphasis on the genusThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. FK506 Resistance ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Epidemiological Study onOsong public health and research perspectives · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Influence of cancer treatment on the Candida albicans isolated from the oral cavities of cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  16. Candida infections among neutropenic patients.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2016
    Article
  17. Oral Candidiasis among Cancer Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Chennai, South India: An Evaluation of Clinicomycological Association and Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A SafdarInfectious Diseases Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, USA.
V Chaturvedi
E W Cross
S Park
E M Bernard
D Armstrong
D S Perlin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since most nosocomial systemic yeast infections arise from the endogenous flora of the patient, we prospectively evaluated the species stratification and antifungal susceptibility profile of Candida spp. associated with heavy colonization and systemic infection in patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. A total of 349 Candida isolates were obtained from 223 patients during the later half of 1998. Cancer was the most common underlying disease, occurring in 91% of the patients, including 61.8% with organ and 23.7% with hematological malignancies; 4.4% of the patients had AIDS. Candida albicans was the predominant species (67.3%); among 114 non-albicans Candida spp., C. glabrata (45.6%) was the most frequent, followed by C. tropicalis (18.4%), C. parapsilosis (16.6%), and C. krusei (9.6%). The overall resistance to triazole-based agents among all yeast isolates was 9.4 and 10.8% for fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively. A total of 5% of C. albicans strains were resistant to triazole antifungals, whereas 30.8 and 46.2% of C. glabrata strains were resistant to fluconazole (MIC > or = 64 microg/ml) and itraconazole (MIC > or = 1 microg/ml), respectively. A significant association was observed between prior treatment with triazole and isolation of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans (P = 0.005, OR 36), although this relationship was not seen in C. glabrata isolates (P = 0.4). This study reinforces the importance of periodic, prospective surveillance of clinical fungal isolates to determine appropriate prophylactic, empiric, and preemptive antifungal therapy for the highly susceptible patient population.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID11408236
PMCPMC90613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.