Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11408234›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001

Safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple 750-milligram doses of intravenous levofloxacin in healthy volunteers.

A T Chow, C Fowler, R R Williams, N Morgan, S Kaminski, J Natarajan

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. MRGPRX2 and Adverse Drug Reactions.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterial agents.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2009
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A T ChowThe Robert Wood Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Raritan, New Jersey 08869, USA. achow@prius.jnj.com
C Fowler
R R Williams
N Morgan
S Kaminski
J Natarajan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety and pharmacokinetics of a once-daily high intravenous dose of levofloxacin (750 mg) in 18 healthy volunteers were studied in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center parallel group study. Levofloxacin was well tolerated, and higher maximum concentration of drug in serum and area under the concentration-time curve values were achieved. For difficult-to-treat infections, high daily doses of levofloxacin may be beneficial, and intravenous administration may be preferred in certain clinical settings, such as when treating patients in intensive care units, warranting further evaluation.

Indexed as

LevofloxacinAdultAnti-Infective AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedOfloxacinAnti-Infective AgentsLevofloxacinOfloxacin

Identifiers

PMID11408234
PMCPMC90611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.