Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11408210›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001

Safety and bactericidal activity of rifalazil in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.

R Dietze, L Teixeira, L M Rocha, M Palaci, J L Johnson, C Wells, L Rose, K Eisenach, J J Ellner

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. New antituberculous drugs in development.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2010
    Review
  7. Future novel therapeutic agents for Clostridium difficile infection.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2010
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of the Efficacy of New Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs.The open infectious diseases journal · 2008
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R DietzeNúcleo de Doenças Infecciosas Centro Biomédico, Universidade Federal de Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil. rdietze@npd.ufes.br
L Teixeira
L M Rocha
M Palaci
J L Johnson
C Wells
L Rose
K Eisenach
J J Ellner
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRCase Western Reserve University · USTelesis Corporation (United States) · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

TUBERCULOSIS RESEARCH UNITN01AI045244 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BOAM, HENRY · 1994 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI045244NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-45244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rifalazil, also known as KRM-1648 or benzoxazinorifamycin, is a new semisynthetic rifamycin with a long half-life of approximately 60 h. Rifalazil has potent bactericidal activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro and in animal models of tuberculosis (TB). Prior studies in healthy volunteers showed that once-weekly doses of 25 to 50 mg of rifalazil were well tolerated. In this randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase II clinical trial, 65 subjects with sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB received one of the following regimens for the first 2 weeks of therapy: 16 subjects received isoniazid (INH) (5 mg/kg of body weight) daily; 16 received INH (5 mg/kg) and rifampin (10 mg/kg) daily; 17 received INH (5 mg/kg) daily plus 10 mg of rifalazil once weekly; and 16 received INH (5 mg/kg) daily and 25 mg of rifalazil once weekly. All subjects were then put on 6 months of standard TB therapy. Pretreatment and day 15 sputum CFU of M. tuberculosis were measured to assess the bactericidal activity of each regimen. The number of drug-related adverse experiences was low and not significantly different among treatment arms. A transient decrease in absolute neutrophil count to less than 2,000 cells/mm(3) was detected in 10 to 20% of patients in the rifalazil- and rifampin-containing treatment arms without clinical consequences. Decreases in CFU counts were comparable among the four treatment arms; however, the CFU results were statistically inconclusive due to the variability in the control arms. Acquired drug resistance did not occur in any patient. Studies focused on determining a maximum tolerated dose will help elucidate the full anti-TB effect of rifalazil.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibiotics, AntitubercularAntitubercular AgentsColony Count, MicrobialFemaleHematologic TestsHumansIsoniazidKidney Function TestsLiver Function TestsMaleRifamycinsTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntibiotics, AntitubercularAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidKRM 1648Rifamycins

Identifiers

PMID11408210
PMCPMC90587
OpenAlexW2147990227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.