GuidelineCurrent cardiology reports2001
Guidelines for the acute coronary syndromes.
Guideline in Current cardiology reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional measures employed in the immediate management of patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome have markedly reduced the risk of early death or myocardial infarction. Further incremental benefit is seen with the substitution of enoxaparin for unfractionated heparin, and in the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the evidence for benefit from the glycoprotwin IIb/IIIa inhibitors with medical management alone is unconvincing. Newer data also suggest an aggressive approach to the high-risk patient offers a better ultimate outcome than a conservative one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11406086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.