SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Advanced trauma life support training for ambulance crews.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Is advanced life support better than basic life support in prehospital care? A systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2010Pooled it
- In-service training for health professionals to improve care of the seriously ill newborn or child in low and middle-income countries (Review).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Three decades (1978-2008) of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) practice revised and evidence revisited.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2008Article
- The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Trauma: design, development, and implementation of a North American epidemiologic prehospital trauma registry.Resuscitation · 2008Article
- Pro/con debate: is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization?Critical care (London, England) · 2008Review
- A qualitative study of paramedics' attitudes to providing prehospital thrombolysis.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2005Article
- Prehospital tracheal intubation in severely injured patients: a Danish observational study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an increasing global burden of disease from injuries. Models of trauma care initially developed in high-income countries are also being adopted in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Amongst these ambulance crews with Advanced Life Support (ALS) training are being promoted in LMIC as a strategy for improving outcomes for victims of trauma. However there is controversy as to the effectiveness of this health service intervention, and the evidence has yet to be rigorously appraised.
objectivesTo quantify the effectiveness of ambulance crews with ALS training versus crews with any other level of training in reducing mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CCTR), the specialised register of the Cochrane Injuries Group, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and the National Research Register. We checked references of background papers and contacted authors to identify additional published or unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials and controlled before-and-after studies comparing effectiveness of ambulance crews with ALS training versus crews with any other levels of training in reducing mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. Studies which compared crews staffed by physicians versus others were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria to trial reports for inclusion and extracted data. MAIN
resultsWe found one randomised controlled trial, which included 16 trauma cases. However, outcome data were added to the main non-randomised cohort in the analysis, and data on these 16 cases are not yet available. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsIn the absence of evidence of the effectiveness of advanced life support, strong argument could be made that it should not be promoted outside the context of a properly concealed and otherwise rigorously conducted randomised controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11406080What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.