SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review: Are herbal and homeopathic remedies used during pregnancy safe?Curationis · 2016Pooled it
- Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2011Pooled it
- Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Mifepristone for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Hyaluronidase for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005Pooled it
- Homoeopathy for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Oral prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for cervical ripening or induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Extra-amniotic prostaglandin for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Amniotomy alone for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000Pooled it
- Randomized double masked trial of Zhi Byed 11, a Tibetan traditional medicine, versus misoprostol to prevent postpartum hemorrhage in Lhasa, Tibet.Journal of midwifery & women's healthTrial
- Castor Oil for Induction of Labor: A Safe and Effective Method: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study in a University Hospital Setting.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Heterogenous use of misoprostol for induction of labour: results of an online survey among midwives in German-speaking countries.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Article
- What started your labor? Responses from mothers in the third pregnancy, infection, and nutrition study.The Journal of perinatal education · 2014Article
- Use of nonmedical methods of labor induction and pain management among U.S. women.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCastor oil, a potent cathartic, is derived from the bean of the castor plant. Anecdotal reports, which date back to ancient Egypt have suggested the use of castor oil to stimulate labour. Castor oil has been widely used as a traditional method of initiating labour in midwifery practice. Its role in the initiation of labour is poorly understood and data examining its efficacy within a clinical trial are limited. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using standardised methodology.
objectivesTo determine the effects of castor oil or enemas for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour in comparison with other methods of cervical ripening or induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and bibliographies of relevant papers. Last searched: November 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: (1) clinical trials comparing castor oil, bath or enemas used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other methods listed above it on a predefined list of labour induction methods; (2) random allocation to the treatment or control group; (3) adequate allocation concealment; (4) violations of allocated management not sufficient to materially affect conclusions; (5) clinically meaningful outcome measures reported; (6) data available for analysis according to the random allocation; (7) missing data insufficient to materially affect the conclusions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A strategy has been developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction. This involves a two-stage method of data extraction. MAIN
resultsIn the one included study of 100 women, which compared a single dose of castor oil versus no treatment, no difference was found between caesarean section rates (relative risk (RR) 2.31, 95% CI 0.77, 6.87). No data were presented on neonatal or maternal mortality or morbidity. There was no difference between either the rate of meconium stained liquor (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.25,2.36) or Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.02,45.71) between the two groups. The number of participants was small hence only large differences in outcomes could have been detected. All women who ingested castor oil felt nauseous. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe only trial included in this review attempts to address the role of castor oil as an induction agent. The trial was small and of poor methodological quality. Further research is needed to attempt to quantify the efficacy of castor oil as an induction agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.