Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11406013›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001

Conservative management for post prostatectomy urinary incontinence.

K N Moore, D J Cody, C M Glazener

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06209307 (Preoperative Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy to Minimize Stress Urinary Incontinence After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06209307 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy to Minimize Stress Urinary Incontinence After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, IrvineRan2024 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsProstatic Hyperplasia, Stress Urinary IncontinenceArmsPelvic floor physical therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K N MooreFaculty of Nursing 3rd Floor Clinical Sciences Bldg, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2G3. katherine.moore@ualberta.ca
D J Cody
C M Glazener

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary incontinence after prostatectomy is a common problem. Conservative management of this condition includes pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback, electrical stimulation using a rectal electrode, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, or a combination of methods.

objectivesTo assess the effects of conservative management for urinary incontinence after transurethral, suprapubic, radical retropubic or perineal prostatectomy. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Incontinence Group's trials register, Medline, Cinahl, Embase, PsycLit and ERIC all up to January 1999, and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted investigators to locate studies and we handsearched the following conference proceedings: American Urological Association (1989-1999); Society of Urologic Nurses and Associates (1991-1998); Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses (1996-1999); and International Continence Society (1980-1998). Date of most recent searches: January 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials which evaluated conservative management aimed at improving urinary continence after prostatectomy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of studies and abstracted data from included trials onto a standard form. MAIN

resultsOnly five randomised trials were identified which included 365 men, each evaluating different treatments, and all studying men after radical prostatectomy. The trials were of moderate quality and data were not available for many of the pre-stated outcomes. Confidence intervals for both dichotomous and continuous data were wide; it was not possible to reliably identify or rule out a useful effect. Men's symptoms tended to improve over time, irrespective of management. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe value of the various approaches to conservative management of post prostatectomy incontinence remains uncertain. Further well designed trials are needed.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyExercise TherapyHumansMaleProstatectomyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.