Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11404320›Full record

ArticleGenetics2001

RAG4 gene encodes a glucose sensor in Kluyveromyces lactis.

S Betina, P Goffrini, I Ferrero, M Wésolowski-Louvel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S BetinaUnité Microbiologie et Génétique, Université Claude Bernard, 43, Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cédex, France.
P Goffrini
I Ferrero
M Wésolowski-Louvel
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rag4 mutant of Kluyveromyces lactis was previously isolated as a fermentation-deficient mutant, in which transcription of the major glucose transporter gene RAG1 was affected. The wild-type RAG4 was cloned by complementation of the rag4 mutation and found to encode a protein homologous to Snf3 and Rgt2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These two proteins are thought to be sensors of low and high concentrations of glucose, respectively. Rag4, like Snf3 and Rgt2, is predicted to have the transmembrane structure of sugar transporter family proteins as well as a long C-terminal cytoplasmic tail possessing a characteristic 25-amino-acid sequence. Rag4 may therefore be expected to have a glucose-sensing function. However, the rag4 mutation was fully complemented by one copy of either SNF3 or RGT2. Since K. lactis appears to have no other genes of the SNF3/RGT2 type, we suggest that Rag4 of K. lactis may have a dual function of signaling high and low concentrations of glucose. In rag4 mutants, glucose repression of several inducible enzymes is abolished.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBacterial ProteinsBiological TransportBlotting, NorthernCell-Free SystemCell MembraneCloning, MolecularFungal ProteinsGene DeletionGlucoseKluyveromycesMembrane ProteinsModels, GeneticMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsMutationPhenotypeBacterial ProteinsFungal ProteinsGlucoseMembrane ProteinsMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsRAG4 protein, KluyveromycesRGT2 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSNF3 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID11404320
PMCPMC1461679
OpenAlexW2140510166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.