Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11403576›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2001

Application of fluorescence resonance energy transfer to the GroEL-GroES chaperonin reaction.

H S Rye

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Substrate protein dependence of GroEL-GroES interaction cycle revealed by high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Symmetric GroEL:GroES2 complexes are the protein-folding functional form of the chaperonin nanomachine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  11. Substrate protein switches GroE chaperonins from asymmetric to symmetric cycling by catalyzing nucleotide exchange.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Triggering protein folding within the GroEL-GroES complex.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2008
    Article
  16. Setting the chaperonin timer: a two-stroke, two-speed, protein machine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2008
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

H S RyeDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, 229 Lewis Thomas Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA. hrye@molbio.princeton.edu
Princeton University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Chaperonin-Mediated Protein FoldingR01GM065421 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI RYE, HAYS S · 2003 to 2013
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a sensitive and flexible method for studying protein-protein interactions. Here it is applied to the GroEL-GroES chaperonin system to examine the ATP-driven dynamics that underlie protein folding by this chaperone. Relying on the known structures of GroEL and GroES, sites for attachment of fluorescent probes are designed into the sequence of both proteins. Because these sites are brought close in space when GroEL and GroES form a complex, excitation energy can pass from a donor to an acceptor chromophore by FRET. While in ideal circumstances FRET can be used to measure distances, significant population heterogeneity in the donor-to-acceptor distances in the GroEL-GroES complex makes distance determination difficult. This is due to incomplete labeling of these large, oligomeric proteins and to their rotational symmetry. It is shown, however, that FRET can still be used to follow protein-protein interaction dynamics even in a case such as this, where distance measurements are either not practical or not meaningful. In this way, the FRET signal is used as a simple proximity sensor to score the interaction between GroEL and GroES. Similarly, FRET can also be used to follow interactions between GroEL and a fluorescently labeled substrate polypeptide. Thus, while knowledge of molecular structure aids enormously in the design of FRET experiments, structural information is not necessarily required if the aim is to measure the thermodynamics or kinetics of a protein interaction event by following changes in the binding proximity of two components.

Indexed as

Energy TransferProtein FoldingChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Fluorescent DyesModels, MolecularProtein ConformationSpectrometry, FluorescenceChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Fluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID11403576
PMCPMC3744193
OpenAlexW1997156132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.