Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11402333›Full record

ReviewOncogene2001

Jun, the oncoprotein.

P K Vogt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P K VogtDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Reasearch Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Drive, La Jolla, California, CA 9203, USA.
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular Jun (c-Jun) and viral Jun (v-Jun) can induce oncogenic transformation. For this activity, c-Jun requires an upstream signal, delivered by the Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). v-Jun does not interact with JNK; it is autonomous and constitutively active. v-Jun and c-Jun address overlapping but not identical sets of genes. Whether all genes essential for transformation reside within the overlap of the v-Jun and c-Jun target spectra remains to be determined. The search for transformation-relevant targets of Jun is moving into a new stage with the application of DNA microarrays technology. Genetic screens and functional tests remain a necessity for the identification of genes that control the oncogenic phenotype.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticAnimalsConsensus SequenceDimerizationDNA-Binding ProteinsG-Box Binding FactorsGene Expression ProfilingMutationOncogene Protein p65(gag-jun)Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-junTranscriptional ActivationTranscription Factor AP-1Transcription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsG-Box Binding FactorsOncogene Protein p65(gag-jun)Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-junTranscription Factor AP-1Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID11402333
OpenAlexW2325011840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.