ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2000
Dynamics of stimulation-induced muscle adaptation: insights from varying the duty cycle.
Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Muscle Plasticity, Adaptation and Epigenetics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Adaptive conditioning of skeletal muscle in a large animal model (Sus domesticus).Journal of anatomy · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to gain insight into the dynamics of the signalling process that initiates adaptive change in mammalian skeletal muscles in response to chronic neuromuscular stimulation. Programmable miniature stimulators were implanted into rabbits and used to impose one of the following patterns on the dorsiflexors of one ankle: 10 Hz delivered in equal on/off periods of 30 s, 30 min, or 12 h (all equivalent in terms of aggregate impulse activity to continuous 5 Hz). Two further groups received continuous stimulation at 5 Hz or 10 Hz. In every case the stimulation pattern was maintained continuously for 6 weeks. Tibialis anterior muscles stimulated intermittently with equal on/off periods of 30 s, 30 min and 12 h had contractile characteristics that were significantly slower than the contralateral, unstimulated muscles but did not differ from those of muscles stimulated continuously at 5 Hz. Muscles stimulated continuously at 10 Hz were significantly slower than either contralateral muscles or muscles stimulated with any of the other patterns. Corresponding changes were seen in myosin heavy chain isoform composition. The fatigue index, defined as the fraction of tension remaining after 5 min of a standard fatigue test, was 0.4 for muscles in the contralateral group but equal to or greater than 0.85 for muscles of all the stimulated groups. These results were interpreted with the help of a simple model of the growth and decay of a putative signalling substance based on first order kinetics. The model suggests a rate constant for the accumulation of the signalling substance that is greater than 30 h(-1), and a rate constant for its removal that is greater than 50 h(-1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
11392554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.