Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11389823›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2001

Transcription factors and other dysregulated proteins in melanoma prognosis.

J M Karjalainen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J M KarjalainenDepartment of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 1777, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland. Jari.Karjalainen@uku.fi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately one third of patients with cutaneous melanoma later develop a metastatic disease, having then an extremely poor rate of survival. Because of the highly unpredictable nature of melanomas, finding those patients who are likely to develop a metastatic disease and those patients who probably will survive is an ongoing challenge. The current "conventional" prognosticators, such as Breslow thickness, Clark level of invasion, and ulceration, cannot perfectly predict the clinical course of this disease at an individual level. Although the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction techniques have significantly improved the staging of patients with melanoma, new molecular prognostic markers may help in selection of appropriate patients for strenuous adjuvant therapies and for randomized clinical trials. Furthermore, these markers also improve our basic understanding of the biology of cutaneous melanoma, potentially offering new targets for novel treatment strategies. This paper reviews the current literature on transcription factors and other dysregulated proteins involved in melanoma prognosis.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHumansMelanomaNeoplasm ProteinsPrognosisSkin NeoplasmsTranscription FactorsBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.