Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11389816›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2001

Prevention of cervical cancer with vaccines.

S S Im, B J Monk, L P Villarreal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Immunization with a plant-produced colorectal cancer antigen.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S S ImDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of California-Irvine, Bio Sciences II, Room 3232, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
B J Monk
L P Villarreal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. This is especially true in developing countries, where Papanicolaou smear screening, an effective preventive measure against cervical cancer, is insufficiently implemented. With growing evidence for human papillomavirus as a central etiologic factor in cervical neoplasia, development of a vaccine against this virus has emerged as an important objective in prevention of cervical cancer. International efforts in vaccine development have culminated in advancement of various vaccine strategies and initiation of human clinical trials. Reports from animal vaccine trials and early phase I human trials indicate markedly enhanced immune response through vaccination. However, the clinical significance of these results requires confirmation from long-term human trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsTumor Virus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsViral VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.