ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2001
Optic Neuritis.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal Study of Retinal Structure, Vascular, and Neuronal Function in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: 1-Year Follow-Up.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- The role of magnetic resonance imaging and visual evoked potential in management of optic neuritis.The Pan African medical journal · 2014Article
- Management of optic neuritis.Indian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with signs and symptoms consistent with acute monosymptomatic optic neuritis should undergo evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the brain and orbits to determine whether or not they are at high risk for the development of clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS). The presence of two or more white matter lesions (3 mm or larger in diameter, at least one lesion periventricular or ovoid) suggests high risk for CDMS, and should prompt immediate treatment as follows: Intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate (1 g intravenously per day for 3 days) followed by oral prednisone (1 mg/kg per day for 11 days) with a 4-day taper (20 mg on day 1, 10 mg on days 2 and 4). Interferon beta 1-a, which has been demonstrated to significantly reduce the 3-year probability of the development of CDMS and the development of clinically silent MRI lesions in high-risk patients with acute optic neuritis, should be considered following IV methylprednisolone treatment (30 &mgr;g intramuscularly weekly). In monosymptomatic patients with fewer than two white matter lesions by MRI, and in patients for whom a diagnosis of CDMS has been established, treatment with IV methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone (as outlined), should be considered on an individual basis and may hasten visual recovery, but has not been demonstrated to affect long-term visual outcome. In all cases of typical acute monosymptomatic demyelinating optic neuritis, oral prednisone alone at a dose of 1 mg/kg per day, without prior treatment with IV methylprednisolone (1 g per day for 3 days), may increase the risk for recurrent optic neuritis, and should be avoided.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.