Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11389316›Full record

ArticleQuality in health care : QHC2001

Access to the evidence base from general practice: a survey of general practice staff in Northern and Yorkshire Region.

P Wilson, J Droogan, J Glanville, I Watt, G Hardman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality in health care : QHC, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bridging the gaps between research, policy and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a survey of health care providers.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Surveying the medical literature: five notable articles in general internal medicine from 2008 and 2009.Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The National Health Service and the internet.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2003
    Review
  14. Evidence based medicine: an overview.Journal of family & community medicine · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P WilsonNHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO1 5DD, UK. pmw7@york.ac.uk
J Droogan
J Glanville
I Watt
G Hardman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify and describe current methods of making health related research evidence accessible to general practice staff in the Northern and Yorkshire Region.

methodA postal survey questionnaire of general practice staff in the Northern and Yorkshire Region.

resultsAt least one completed questionnaire was obtained from 70% of the general practices surveyed, and the individual response rate to the survey was 45%. Just under 60% of all respondents reported having no access to the NHS internet and just under 50% also reported having no access to the internet. All respondents in this survey reported greater access to paper based information than to electronic databases. However, this research provides evidence of differential access to information resources between different professions in general practice with GPs clearly having easier access than other professions to both paper based resources and electronic databases. 70% of all respondents said that they would need to be trained to use either a computer, the internet, or to search databases if the opportunity for easy access to any of these information services was available.

conclusionsAt the time of this survey, general practices seemed to be struggling to set up the infrastructure and develop the skills that are necessary to make best use of available research evidence. In addition, there is a need for further investigation into the reasons why different professions working in the same practice setting have differential access to information resources available in primary care.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineComputer User TrainingFamily PracticeHumansInformation ServicesInternetPractice Management, MedicalState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID11389316
PMCPMC1757985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.