Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11382803›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2001

Integrated allosteric model of voltage gating of HCN channels.

C Altomare, A Bucchi, E Camatini, M Baruscotti, C Viscomi, A Moroni, D DiFrancesco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Roles of funny HCN.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP · 2025
    Review
  5. Functional Alterations in Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons after Traumatic Brain Injury in Somatosensory Cortex of Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A gain-of-function HCN4 mutant in the HCN domain is responsible for inappropriate sinus tachycardia in a Spanish family.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Fifty years of gating currents and channel gating.The Journal of general physiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Retinal Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of HCN1 Genetic Epilepsy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Bidirectional flow of the funny current (IProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C AltomareDipartimento di Fisiologia e Biochimica Generali, via Celoria 26, and INFM-Unità Milano Università, via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy.
A Bucchi
E Camatini
M Baruscotti
C Viscomi
A Moroni
D DiFrancesco

Funding

Telethon 971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperpolarization-activated (pacemaker) channels are dually gated by negative voltage and intracellular cAMP. Kinetics of native cardiac f-channels are not compatible with HH gating, and require closed/open multistate models. We verified that members of the HCN channel family (mHCN1, hHCN2, hHCN4) also have properties not complying with HH gating, such as sigmoidal activation and deactivation, activation deviating from fixed power of an exponential, removal of activation "delay" by preconditioning hyperpolarization. Previous work on native channels has indicated that the shifting action of cAMP on the open probability (Po) curve can be accounted for by an allosteric model, whereby cAMP binds more favorably to open than closed channels. We therefore asked whether not only cAMP-dependent, but also voltage-dependent gating of hyperpolarization-activated channels could be explained by an allosteric model. We hypothesized that HCN channels are tetramers and that each subunit comprises a voltage sensor moving between "reluctant" and "willing" states, whereas voltage sensors are independently gated by voltage, channel closed/open transitions occur allosterically. These hypotheses led to a multistate scheme comprising five open and five closed channel states. We estimated model rate constants by fitting first activation delay curves and single exponential time constant curves, and then individual activation/deactivation traces. By simply using different sets of rate constants, the model accounts for qualitative and quantitative aspects of voltage gating of all three HCN isoforms investigated, and allows an interpretation of the different kinetic properties of different isoforms. For example, faster kinetics of HCN1 relative to HCN2/HCN4 are attributable to higher HCN1 voltage sensors' rates and looser voltage-independent interactions between subunits in closed/open transitions. It also accounts for experimental evidence that reduction of sensors' positive charge leads to negative voltage shifts of Po curve, with little change of curve slope. HCN voltage gating thus involves two processes: voltage sensor gating and allosteric opening/closing.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNerve Tissue ProteinsAnimalsCloning, MolecularCyclic AMPCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsElectrophysiologyHumansHyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated ChannelsIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsKineticsMicePotassium ChannelsCyclic AMPCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsHCN1 protein, humanHcn1 protein, mouseHyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated ChannelsIon ChannelsNerve Tissue ProteinsPotassium Channels

Identifiers

PMID11382803
PMCPMC2232403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.