Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11381790›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science

A & E services in Ireland: the potential role of general practice in accident and emergency services.

G Bury, P Hungerford, D Langton, P Plunkett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G BuryDepartment of General Practice, University College Dublin, St James's Hospital, Dublin.
P Hungerford
D Langton
P Plunkett
University College Dublin · IESt. James's Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 1996, Irish accident and emergency (A&E) departments had approximately 1.2 million visits. General practitioners (GPs) have been shown to work efficiently in A&E.

aimThis study aimed to describe the current A&E structures in Ireland and the potential contribution of general practice.

methodQuestionnaires were sent to all 43 Irish A&E departments seeking information on staffing levels, training posts and interest in the role of GPs within the department.

resultsThirty-four (79%) hospitals responded, representing at least 71% of all A&E visits. Eleven (32%) had A&E consultants. In 16 (47%) hospitals the A&E department was supervised by other consultants; in 14 supervision was for five hours per week or less. Seven hospitals had no consultant supervision. Twenty-six (76%) had NCHDs assigned to the department. Only 11% of NCHDs were in training in A&E medicine. Six departments employed GPs but 28 said they would like to do so. Most wished GPs to see non-urgent cases but one-third wished them to see all cases. Current staffing levels had little relationship with departmental workload.

conclusionsThe limited consultant supervision and small numbers of NCHDs in training for A&E medicine raise concerns about staffing. Most hospitals want GPs to work in their A&E departments. This has implications for training and for the interface between general practice and the A & E department.

Indexed as

Physicians, FamilyEmergency Service, HospitalFamily PracticeHumansIrelandMedical Staff, HospitalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID11381790
OpenAlexW2063354444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.