Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11381032›Full record

ArticleGenome research2001

Analysis of the cat eye syndrome critical region in humans and the region of conserved synteny in mice: a search for candidate genes at or near the human chromosome 22 pericentromere.

T K Footz, P Brinkman-Mills, G S Banting, S A Maier, M A Riazi, L Bridgland, S Hu, B Birren, S Minoshima, N Shimizu and 17 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lentiviral MediatedFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. BCL2L13: physiological and pathological meanings.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. American journal of cancer research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

T K FootzDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada.
P Brinkman-Mills
G S Banting
S A Maier
M A Riazi
L Bridgland
S Hu
B Birren
S Minoshima
N Shimizu
H Pan
T Nguyen
F Fang
Y Fu
L Ray
H Wu
S Shaull
S Phan
Z Yao
F Chen
A Huan
P Hu
Q Wang
P Loh
S Qi
B A Roe
H E McDermid
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

SEQUENCING HUMAN CHROMOSOME 22, CENTROMERE TO NF2R01HG000313 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI ROE, BRUCE A · 1990 to 1999
–
NHGRI NIH HHS HG00313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have sequenced a 1.1-Mb region of human chromosome 22q containing the dosage-sensitive gene(s) responsible for cat eye syndrome (CES) as well as the 450-kb homologous region on mouse chromosome 6. Fourteen putative genes were identified within or adjacent to the human CES critical region (CESCR), including three known genes (IL-17R, ATP6E, and BID) and nine novel genes, based on EST identity. Two putative genes (CECR3 and CECR9) were identified, in the absence of EST hits, by comparing segments of human and mouse genomic sequence around two solitary amplified exons, thus showing the utility of comparative genomic sequence analysis in identifying transcripts. Of the 14 genes, 10 were confirmed to be present in the mouse genomic sequence in the same order and orientation as in human. Absent from the mouse region of conserved synteny are CECR1, a promising CES candidate gene from the center of the contig, neighboring CECR4, and CECR7 and CECR8, which are located in the gene-poor proximal 400 kb of the contig. This latter proximal region, located approximately 1 Mb from the centromere, shows abundant duplicated gene fragments typical of pericentromeric DNA. The margin of this region also delineates the boundary of conserved synteny between the CESCR and mouse chromosome 6. Because the proximal CESCR appears abundant in duplicated segments and, therefore, is likely to be gene poor, we consider the putative genes identified in the distal CESCR to represent the majority of candidate genes for involvement in CES.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageAbnormalities, MultipleAnimalsCentromereChromosomes, Human, Pair 22Conserved SequenceCraniofacial AbnormalitiesExonsExpressed Sequence TagsEye AbnormalitiesHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMiceNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPhysical Chromosome MappingRats

Identifiers

PMID11381032
PMCPMC311098
OpenAlexW2159979077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.