Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11381028›Full record

ArticleGenome research2001

Segmental duplications: organization and impact within the current human genome project assembly.

J A Bailey, A M Yavor, H F Massa, B J Trask, E E Eichler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 385 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
385citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

385 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rare, Damaging DNA Variants inCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Germline hypomethylation shapes dynamic CpG reservoirs in ape genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Influence ofGenome research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The diploid reference genome of a human embryonic stem cell line.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Benchmark for simple and complex genome inversions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Influence ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

325 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J A BaileyDepartment of Genetics and Center for Human Genetics, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
A M Yavor
H F Massa
B J Trask
E E Eichler

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
MECHANISM &INSTABILITY OF PERICENTROMERIC DUPLICATIONSR01GM058815 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EICHLER, EVAN · 1999 to 2010
$2.9M
BAC RESOURCE FOR CYTOGENIC ANALYSES OF HUMAN GENOMEU24CA080295 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TRASK, BARBARA J. · 1998 to 2001
$499k
NCI NIH HHS CA80295NIGMS NIH HHS GM58815NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058815NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmental duplications play fundamental roles in both genomic disease and gene evolution. To understand their organization within the human genome, we have developed the computational tools and methods necessary to detect identity between long stretches of genomic sequence despite the presence of high copy repeats and large insertion-deletions. Here we present our analysis of the most recent genome assembly (January 2001) in which we focus on the global organization of these segments and the role they play in the whole-genome assembly process. Initially, we considered only large recent duplication events that fell well-below levels of draft sequencing error (alignments 90%-98% similar and > or =1 kb in length). Duplications (90%-98%; > or =1 kb) comprise 3.6% of all human sequence. These duplications show clustering and up to 10-fold enrichment within pericentromeric and subtelomeric regions. In terms of assembly, duplicated sequences were found to be over-represented in unordered and unassigned contigs indicating that duplicated sequences are difficult to assign to their proper position. To assess coverage of these regions within the genome, we selected BACs containing interchromosomal duplications and characterized their duplication pattern by FISH. Only 47% (106/224) of chromosomes positive by FISH had a corresponding chromosomal position by comparison. We present data that indicate that this is attributable to misassembly, misassignment, and/or decreased sequencing coverage within duplicated regions. Surprisingly, if we consider putative duplications >98% identity, we identify 10.6% (286 Mb) of the current assembly as paralogous. The majority of these alignments, we believe, represent unmerged overlaps within unique regions. Taken together the above data indicate that segmental duplications represent a significant impediment to accurate human genome assembly, requiring the development of specialized techniques to finish these exceptional regions of the genome. The identification and characterization of these highly duplicated regions represents an important step in the complete sequencing of a human reference genome.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationHuman Genome ProjectBase SequenceCentromereComputational BiologyContig MappingDatabases, FactualHumansMolecular Sequence DataTelomere

Identifiers

PMID11381028
PMCPMC311093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.