ArticleNucleic acids research2001
Quantification of mRNA expression by competitive PCR using non-homologous competitors containing a shifted restriction site.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing zygosity in progeny of transgenic plants: current methods and perspectives.Journal of biological methods · 2016Review
- Isolation and characterization of the ecdysone receptor and its heterodimeric partner ultraspiracle through development in Sciara coprophila.Chromosoma · 2013Article
- Real-time Fluorescent PCR Techniques to Study Microbial-Host Interactions.Methods in microbiology · 2004Review
- Real-time PCR in virology.Nucleic acids research · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the recent introduction of real-time PCR methods, competitive PCR techniques continue to play an important role in nucleic acid quantification because of the significantly lower cost of equipment and consumables. Here we describe a shifted restriction-site competitive PCR (SRS-cPCR) assay based on a modified type of competitor. The competitor fragments are designed to contain a recognition site for a restriction endonuclease that is also present in the target sequence to be quantified, but in a different position. Upon completion of the PCR, the amplicons are digested in the same tube with a single restriction enzyme, without the need to purify PCR products. The generated competitor- and target-specific restriction fragments display different sizes, and can be readily separated by electrophoresis and quantified by image analysis. Suboptimal digestion affects competitor- and target-derived amplicons to the same extent, thus eliminating the problem of incorrect quantification as a result of incomplete digestion of PCR products. We have established optimized conditions for a panel of 20 common restriction endonucleases permitting efficient digestion in PCR buffer. It is possible, therefore, to find a suitable restriction site for competitive PCR in virtually any sequence of interest. The assay presented is inexpensive, widely applicable, and permits reliable and accurate quantification of nucleic acid targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.